the fight against hysteria

http://theantifeminist.com/david-thomas-on-child-sex-abuse-hysteria-and-mens-human-rights-1993/

Today MHRAs believe that it is right for feminists to lock up men as ‘paedophiles’ for looking at, in the privacy of their own homes, pictures of 30 year old women with small breasts. Any MRA who claims even this as a men’s rights issue deserves, in the words of the leader of the MHRM, ‘to be fucked in prison like a little girl’.

I think we can all relate with the fight against hysteria today.

this is another good example of why we cannot consider AVFM allies against feminism. the link leads to one of the better manosphere sites.

I'm familiar with the antifeminist. He tackles the difficult subject of paedo hysteria head on for which he deserves commendation.

Steve Moxon is another excellent writer who exposes this scam for what it is. http://stevemoxon.blogspot.co.uk

We also see false rape allegations appallingly regularly for the most pathetic of reasons. I had a load of linked articles on the other forum dealing with this.

I think AVFM do good work but the cost appears to an aversion to this hottest of topics which is operating as intended in closing down discussion about the motives and methods of those who seek to criminalise male heterosexuality.

The problem is hardly ignorable and will have to be tackled head on eventually.

Perhaps the solution lies in the hysterics falling over themselves publically like in these recent examples of mainstream figures being persecuted for months and then found innocent.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10621400/Bill-Roache-found-not-guilty-of-rape-and-assault-charges.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22566887

The comments sections of the MSM clearly demonstrate recignition of the injustice and use of the phrase 'witch hunt'.

An addendum to the previous posting. Famous DJ now cleared after 18 months persecution and loss of his home to legal fees.

This article lists a description of his accusers and gives details of how he was described by the prosecution. This utterly nasty process promoted by ideologues is being shown for the disgrace that it is.

It also has a photo of the high SMV woman Director of Public Prosecutions who is behind the travesty. Hope I stumble on her POF profile. Doesn't look anything like a fembot.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2558975/Prosecutors-dock-Police-CPS-face-damaging-questions-second-celebrity-week-cleared-historic-sex-crimes.html

Ok so maybe I was wrong about the pic.

Here is a statement from an article about her when she took up her post last year.

'She has strong views on rape and those who commit it: In a speech she made last year, Saunders tried to spark a debate about rape and encourage more victims to come forward. At the time she said she was "frustrated by how many rape trials end in acquittals" and said society was "lagging behind the legal system when it comes to its view of women".'

Yeah. We can certainly place our faith in such an unbiased clear thinker who no doubt has examined the facts and figures presented by the feminist lobby in forensic detail.

How's that working out for you Alison?